CALL
Human Connections '98
Questionnaire: Feedback
29 people answered (there were 81 paying attendees, 28 presenters)
1. Most helpful presentations/workshops (title, comments)
| Setting Up a CALL Lab |
directly addresses work concerns, |
interesting |
interesting, funny and entertaining |
| Making an interesting and useful
teacher's home page |
I came away with a homepage! |
Didn't know anything about it |
Creating a website was made very
simple |
| Practical foundations: Using style
sheets in computer-assisted writing classes |
easy to implement, |
practical - stylesheets |
interesting approach to writing |
| Free resources on the net |
immediately useful downloadable
resources |
It'll be helpful for
future lessons |
| Soft/Web Fair |
things in action |
|
|
| Organizing E-mail penpal exchanges |
practical, straightforward with pros
and cons explained |
very close to what I'm
doing |
| Using PowerPoint in Speech and
Presentation Class |
I would like to use PowerPoint |
Showed practical
applications |
| Computers and speech: What's
happening and what isn't. |
personal interest |
good summary |
|
| In an Internet-in |
new ideas |
|
|
| Cross cultural internet projects
for children in Taiwan |
good ideas |
|
|
| Web Bulletin Board -- writing in
LAN connected computer labs |
interesting points about how
students need practice before participating in the internet and describing a useful way to
give that practice |
I was interested in
what they were doing with webpage in their class |
| Connected Learning: Teacher
Training in CALL |
Frank Berberich was
great. |
|
| Eudora & Netscape for beginners |
kind instruction |
|
| ALL SESSIONS |
|
|
|
| Best of the web: a component in an
experimental undergraduate English curriculum |
new information |
|
| Developing learner autonomy through
the International E-Mail Tandem Network |
A very good explanation
of a kind of email exchange that I didn't know much about |
| A business writing course in a
networked environment |
I was interested in
what they were doing with webpage in their class |
| Using multimedia and the internet
to teach debate |
See what is possible
using up-to-date technology |
| Eudora & Netscape for beginners |
|
|
|
| CALL and our goals: Exploring the
link |
|
|
|
| CALL strands examined |
a great exchange of
ideas - this may have been better at the beginning of the weekend |
2. What organizational aspects of the conference did you appreciate?
a. Sessions - 27
b. Networking buffet - 11
c. Forums - 3
d. Featured Speakers - 2
e. Others (webpages, information at entrance, lab workshops, transportation info.,
break times, parties)
3. What organizational aspects of the conference did you fell could have been better?
2 people - access to handouts; name tags for everyone
1 person - more sessions, fewer parallel sessions, copier, phone, fewer panels,
publicity
4. Were the conference fees appropriate?
a. appropriate - 24
b. too expensive - 1 (should be free for JALT members)
c. can pay more - 3
5. What did you think of the conference overall?
a. Excellent - 13
b. Good - 18
c. Fair/Poor - 0
Why - dealt well with novices (2); hands on; flexible; friendly(3); small (3)
6. How did you hear about the conference?
JALT CALL N-SIG - 15
an e-mail list - 6
JALT chapter flyer - 5
the WWW - 5
a friend - 5
email from the organizer - 3
a journal/magazine - 1
your school - 1
7. Did you receive enough information about the conference before coming? If not, what
type of information would have been helpful.
Program - 4
Transportation - 4
Hotel - 4
Others - map on website; Japanese name of university, that the featured speaker wasn't
coming
8. What services would you like to see the CALL N-SIG provide?
one day workshops - 10
a software review archive - 10
local chapter presentations - 9
a CALL resource handbook - 7
workshops in schools - 4
more newsletters - 4
conference proceedings - 4
list of troubleshooters to help with problems - 1
9. What can we do to improve our future CALL N-SIG conferences:
Time of year - 18-Good; 3-Okay - one vote for during the spring vacation
Location - 13-Good; 8-Okay; 1-Not Good; one vote for Kyoto
Variety of speakers - 11-Good; 10-0kay; 1-not good
Suggestions -
(3 people) - higher level sessions
(1 person) - demonstrations for intermediate level users; too much internet;
information about resources outside of the conference; more women presenters; more
information sooner; more lab workshops; more primary and secondary education stuff; more
people; fewer sessions - but more intense |